
Did you know that today has been declared “World Contraception Day?”
I frankly do not know who declared it as such but I don’t care. It’s a great opportunity to think and opine a little about the important of contraception and how it affects the basic human rights of women all over the world.
It is no secret that contraception is an important tool in helping women make one of the most important decisions of her life – whether or not to bear children. Now I know there are a bunch of men out there who think bearing a child is no big deal, that it is just a “natural” thing for a woman to want to do. Well, guys, it really is not that simple.
The fact is that almost 215 million women in this world do not have access to modern birth control. Obviously, most of them are in the underdeveloped nations of the world. So, in these often male-dominated societies, where having more children is a sign of the man’s “masculinity”, women are practically being forced to bear more children. That, of course, then perpetuates the cycle of poverty that has been going on for generations. And it’s not just individual males who are perpetuating this situation. For example, courts in Chile, Ecuador, and Peru have all recently restricted or banned emergency contraception based on the ridiculous claim that it is the same as performing an abortion. In places like the Philippines, public clinics and hospitals have been prohibited for years from distributing any kind of contraception.

Here in the United States, while contraception is more readily available than in underdeveloped countries, there are still battles that are being fought on a daily basis. One of the more aggressive groups trying to make access to contraception easier is the Center for Reproductive Rights. For example, just last year they won a ruling in federal court which compelled the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to revisit the restrictions it put on the availability of emergency contraception, otherwise known as the morning after pill. Unfortunately, despite the presence of a pro-choice administration, they still have to press the FDA to comply with the judge’s order. In addition, the Center is working on the world wide problem. For example, they recently asked the Human Rights Council on Human Rights to focus on the high rates of unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections among low-income women. They are also working with their local partners in Slovakia to examine how government subsidies can expand access to contraception to low-income Slovak women.

Kudos to the Center for Reproductive Rights!
Then, of course, in this country there are the persistent legislative efforts to allow healthcare professionals to refuse to provide emergency contraception to women if they personally object to the product. Don’t even get me started on that one…
And while all this is going on, the anti-abortion movement sits back and refusesd to support providing better access to birth control. To me, this is the height of hypocrisy. Here they have the chance to prevent millions of abortions which I thought was their goal. But, no, they’ve got their head in the sand and refuse to support the only real proven way to prevent abortions. Indeed, I really believe that they would just rather stand outside of the clinics and scream at women as they enter abortion clinics. The irony is that they may be yelling at a woman who is going in to get Norplant inserted or to start a new regimen of birth control pills….
And while I’m at it – where the heck is that male birth control pill?

Related Articles
- Op-Ed Columnist: Birth Control Over Baldness (nytimes.com)
- FDA OKs new, five-day emergency contraceptive (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- One in four don’t use contraceptive (mirror.co.uk)
It is your life and your body,
so cast your vote!!!
There is nothing more important than voting!!!
Hello
I am voting for pro choice!
I am against both for ecoiomnc & constitutional arguments.First there are far better ways to save money in the long run than to get involved in the Federal government providing contraception. That is a state issue. If states want to provide contraception that is their decision. It is not my responsibility as a federal taxpayer to do so. It is not the job of the federal government in general to provide birth control or counseling services either.Second you are making an assumption about my stance on abortion. I despise it but understand that even with a federal ban it would still occur. I actually favor both abstinance & contraceptive education. Neither of which I believe the Federal government should provide. I also believe Roe v. Wade should be overturned and states should be given the right to choose.What I object to fervently is our government paying for abortions around the world or getting involved in fertility decisions overseas. Again not my responsibility as a taxpayer, not the federal governments responsibility under the Constitution.